What a choice. But that’s how a Canadian official tried to pitch tar-sands oil over “bloody oil” from OPEC. The Canadian government also launched a massive public relations campaign to try to stop the European Union from ruling that tar-sands oil is much dirtier than oil extracted under more conventional means.
Why all the fuss? MONEY. BIG MONEY. About three trillion dollars worth over the next twenty-five years, if Canada gets to fully exploit its tar-sands reserves. But an EU study last year found that tar-sands oil pumped as much as 22 percent more carbon into the atmosphere than conventional oil–when the processing of the tar-sands was taken into consideration. That’s why James Hansen, NASA’s renowned scientist, has said it’s “game over” for the planet if full use of Canadian tar-sands is permitted.
So Canada launched its massive PR campaign, the likes of which have never before been seen by EU officials. That’s the word in a solid bit of reporting today from Reuters. In fact, the details of the Canadian campaign appear unseemly, to be frank, as was the Canadian government’s decision to take final decision-making powers on big projects away from regulators and hand them over to the government. Considering how close the government is to Big Oil, it’s very much like sending the fox to guard the chickens. But that move was made by the same official who branded opponents of the tar-sands and pipeline projects “radicals.”
Reading about the Canadian government’s efforts to foist tar-sands onto a reluctant EU–and its fears that the U.S. might take a cue from the EU, if the latter rules against tar-sands–isn’t pretty, but it is important. Here’s the link to Reuters:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/10/us-oil-sands-idUSBRE8490OL20120510


